I think that what Professor Stephen Greenblatt has done sounds interesting. From the article it seems like he has composed a book, based on historical facts, that spectulates on who William Shakespear was. It also sounded like, besides the historical and common facts, there aren't many solid facts in the book. Instead there are lots of speculations. Personally, I think that book sounds rather interesting. I don't mind some speculation. In books I like things to spark my imangination, to keep me interested. 83
While I know I'm not a historian or a Shakespearean expert, I like to belive that William Shakespeare was the Shakespeare. It allows me to believe that if one man could compose all those works of literature, why can't I be amazing too? 26 Why can't I be capable of doing things that future generations will look back on in awe and wonder, how could one single person do so much? (153 words)
While I know I'm not a historian or a Shakespearean expert, I like to belive that William Shakespeare was the Shakespeare. It allows me to believe that if one man could compose all those works of literature, why can't I be amazing too? 26 Why can't I be capable of doing things that future generations will look back on in awe and wonder, how could one single person do so much? (153 words)